A bitcoin investor sued the Huobi trade to get better 400,000 yuan he misplaced whereas buying and selling.
Also Read: Thailand’s Regulators Allow Bitcoin Futures Trading
Too Much Pressure Trading Bitcoin
Wang Tieliang filed a lawsuit towards Huobi and its two companions in Beijing to invalidate his bitcoin trades on the trade. According to Wang, he deposited 1.four million yuan at Huobi to invest on bitcoin in October of 2016. But inside a couple of months, he couldn’t deal with the stress to see himself shedding cash, and cashed out as soon as and for all.
The plaintiff informed the court docket that his trades at Huobi must be invalidated as a result of bitcoin doesn’t exist:
Bitcoin doesn’t exist and isn’t a authorized tender. Marxism says commodity ought to have worth and worth and clearly bitcoin cannot be classed as a commodity. Besides, bitcoin just isn’t an actual currency for it isn’t issued by the central financial institution. Therefore, it shall not be used to commerce or as a fee methodology.
Huobi argued that Wang doesn’t perceive what bitcoin is. And it’s not Huobi that traded with him, it’s different customers on the platform. Huobi solely serves as a third-party platform that has been working lawfully. Huobi added that the value of bitcoin is set by the market, not by the platform.
Another two Beijing-based corporations pleaded that they solely assist Huobi obtain customers’ deposits. As such, they don’t have anything to do with Wang’s losses.
The Court Judgement
The People’s Court of Haidian District, Beijing dismissed the lawsuit, saying buyers must be chargeable for their very own losses. The court docket judgement defined:
When customers commerce bitcoin they’re supposed to completely perceive relative dangers regarding it. They ought to make investments solely the quantity they’ll afford to lose and undertake all obligations.
The court docket decide famous that bitcoin just isn’t a commodity. It has no use worth. The PBOC has no proper to outline bitcoin as a digital commodity. And Huobi has no proper to commerce bitcoin. It can solely supply commerce services.
What do you consider the lawsuit? Do you agree with the decide? Leave your ideas below.